Mohammed Siraj becomes
the first ever Indian bowler to capture 4 wickets in 6 balls and the third in
ODI cricket history. Incidentally, the first two cricketers to have achieved this
are both from Sri Lanka: Chaminda Vaas against Bangladesh in the 2003 World Cup
and Lasith Malinga in the World Cup-2007 against South Africa. But I think
Siraj’s feat should be judged as the best ever from two standpoints: first, it
was the Final of an international tournament, and second, he initiated the
damage in the very top order of the team, never relenting till the finish. We
talked about India’s rarest of rare kind of feat in the Super-4 match against
Pakistan earlier: whereas it was an incredible display of Indian batting in
that match, in the Final today it was an incredible display of fast bowling.
Team India is
immensely capable of such feats whenever its immensely talented cricketers play
to their true potential, and this point naturally brings up the most crucial
point about the constitution of the team: when you do have your best team at
any juncture, why don’t you allow it to go on playing and winning! Why, like in
numerous other occasions in Indian cricket history, did you need to change the
team in the match against Bangladesh? Why your players needed to be given rest
in the midst of an important tournament and that too in the run-up to the ODI
World Cup-2023? You still experimented just because your team had already reached
the Final and thus let your team lose unnecessarily. Why do you have such
repeated urges to lose? A win against Bangladesh would perhaps have further
pushed India up in the ICC ODI rankings. Was it not better even otherwise to
prepare for the World Cup with the maximum possible wins? And, had either Tilak
or Prasidh or the perplexingly axed and demoralized Shami and Suryakumar or the
enigma Shardul played the matches of their life would you have selected them
for the Final? If not, obviously, then why was that experiment necessary? For accomplishing
a consistently performing team you must stick to the best team available and you
must be ready to drop any player in any position if out of form or just
non-performing for which, luckily, you do have plenty of options.
Now, for the Final of an intensely competitive tournament in its two stages the final match was a perfect anti-climax—a real letdown for the thousand of enthusiastic cricket fans. Again, for a tournament that’d been dominated by the spinners all the way the Final was entirely on a different footing with the spinners not getting a chance even to bowl a few overs, forget about taking wickets. Although for the Indian fans the Final proved to be a huge relief of sorts the Sri Lanka fans and genuine cricket lovers were thoroughly frustrated, a 100-over match getting over in only about 22 overs. However, cricket has always been the game of glorious uncertainties and such things do happen and will continue to happen. And star performers like Siraj will also continue to dazzle us.
Comments
Post a Comment
Hi! Welcome! Please comment what you feel! 😊